Chief Justice backs protection of Ganga Ghats in Varanasi

Manikarnika Ghat in Varanasi

In the hearing of Kautilya Society’s Public Interest Litigation, held on 1st April 2014, to protect the River Ganga and its ghats in Varanasi, the Hon’ble Chief Justice of the Allahabad High Court, D.Y. Chandrachud, and Justice Dilip Gupta demanded to know why the Varanasi Development Authority was not respecting High Court Orders on protecting the Ganga ghats in Varanasi. Chief Justice expressed grave concern that local authorities were violating laws by permitting new constructions within 200 metres of river Ganga. He rejected outright all appeals made by owners of illegal constructions to annul the PIL, affirming the public importance of the issue. He was shocked at the absence of a Heritage legislation and a Heritage Committee that could ensure the protection of the sacred city, the river and its riverfront ghats. The next hearing will be on 16 April 2014 when the Kautilya Society will submit, to the Chief Justice, a brief on the main appeals and documents of the PIL hearings in the Allahabad High Court since 2005. See news articles published in various local newspapers of Varanasi:

Article in Times of IndiaNews published in Aaj VaranasiNews published in Hindustan Varanasi

Varanasi Ghat PIL hearing in Allahabad High Court on 9 November 2013

On 8 November 2013,  the Allahabad High Court judge bench, comprising Justice Ashok Bhushan and Justice Arun Tandon, heard the PIL filed by the Kautilya Society on the Varanasi Ghats. On this hearing, the VDA was supposed to submit a response to queries on the irregularities of the Darbhanga Palace, made in the Allahabad High Court Order of 9 October 2013. The Darbhanga Palace is included in a list of 57 buildings officially declared by VDA as illegal constructions in violation of the Government Order prohibiting new constructions within 200 metres of banks of the River Ganga. The VDA had also submitted this list to the Allahabad High Court in May 2008.

Darbhanga Palace in Varanasi – before demolition (2001), after new constructions (2013)

On the 8th November hearing, the VDA submitted an affidavit stating that the new four-floor building made in the rear portion of the Darbhanga Palace was an authorised construction. The VDA argued that the rehabilitation of the Darbhanga Palace was as per the map it had sanctioned in 1997 and 2005 and that no new construction had ever been made in the premises of this building. On the contrary, in the PIL hearing of 9th October 2013, the VDA had confirmed that the Darbhanga Palace owners had not complied with the conditions that were laid down in their order sanctioning the rehabilitation of the Palace building.

On the 8th November hearing, the owners of the Darbhanga Palace also submitted an affidavit. They requested that the PIL, filed by the Kautilya Society in 2005, be dismissed in view of the FIRs (criminal cases) that had been filed against the petitioners of the PIL, i.e. the Kautilya Society and Vrinda Dar (who defends the PIL in person). They argued that the criminal cases lodged against the Kautilya Society and Vrinda Dar demonstrated that (i) the PIL was filed in private interest rather than in public interest and (ii) the credibility of the organisation was under suspicion. In its order of 9th November 2013, Allahabad High Court gave the petitioner three weeks to respond to the affidavits submitted by the VDA and the owners of the Darbhanga Palace.

The next hearing of the PIL in the Allahabad High Court has been fixed for 18 December 2013.

—–

See the compete list of  the Orders by the Allahabad High Court on the Public Interest Litigation –  Year: 2005 –  Number 31229

The second FIR to Kautilya Society by Varanasi Authorities

In our post of the 11th of June we reported the story of  the first FIR filed against the Kautilya Society members.

Fearing that the Varanasi authorities would use the non-bailable sections quoted in the FIR to prevent me from appearing in the hearings of the Allahabad High Court hearing (or at least be sufficiently harassed to withdraw the PIL from the High Court) I reported the whole issue to the Varanasi Superintendent of Police and asked them to verify if there was any improper use of power by the VDA against her or the Kautilya Society.

Finally some response did come from the Varanasi Superintendent of Police. But it was not a response to the report of the Kautilya Society on misuse of power by VDA officers. And what was it? Another FIR!

“Punishment for cheating by personation”

The second FIR was lodged on the direct and explicit instructions of Mr. Ajay Kumar Mishra, Senior Superintendent of Varanasi Police, on indication by the Varanasi Divisional Commissioner, Mr. Chanchal Tiwari. It charged all 9 founders of Kautilya Society of non-bailable criminal offences like “cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property (IPC 420), forgery of valuable security (IPC 467),” etc. The allegations that have been made do not give specific instances of irregularities but make general accusations that the KS has many foreign members and that the KS receives funds from foreigners. Both facts are true, but neither of them is an offence. All KS activities are implemented as per its bylaws and as per the rules and regulations of the country.

The Times of India, in its article reported my statement, “since the filing of PIL we are being harassed in similar style as not only the local authorities but the entire machinery has been exposed on the issue of illegal construction in the prohibited zone. But we are prepared for it and under no circumstances will we withdraw the PIL” As in the case of the other FIR, Varanasi newspapers that were previously supporting the KS against the inefficient local administration have generally given ample resonance to the lodged FIRs without counter-checking the issue with the KS.

The KS is contesting the charges and believes that it is a blatant case of malicious institutional harassment and misuse of government power.

The main accusation is that Kautilya Society has foreign members in its Managing Committee. Sure, it is an NGO where foreigners are among its founding members as well as its current ordinary members. All foreigners who become members and sometimes also reside in the Kautilya Society premises are duly reported to the Local Police Office. The names and details of the Managing Committee members and the organisational activities have always been reported to the Registrar of Societies that has approved and renewed the official status of the organisation. The KS receives donations in Indian rupees from both Indian and Foreign members who avail of its services within the society premises and this is an activity within the bye laws of the Society, it is permitted under the FCRA (Foreign Currency Regulation Act 2010, Clause 2, Explanation 3) and it is regularly assessed and reported to the Income Tax Authorities through audited accounts.

In a written reply to the District Authorities, the KS stated that:

  • “We have always declared the organizational activities and regularly audited and declared the financial transactions to concerned offices. In fact, our Society was accorded renewal in 2008 on the basis of our regular functioning;
  • The Society has foreign members in accordance with its byelaws and the Memorandum of Association that is in accordance with the Indian Society Registration Act 1860 that permits foreigners to subscribe to the Memorandum of Association of a Society. The names and details of the members of Kautilya Society Managing Committee has always been shared with the concerned offices.
  • The names and details of all foreign members who consult our study and resource centre, visit, work with us or stay in our premises have always been declared to the Local Foreign Registration Office.
  • Our funds are always audited and submitted to the concerned offices. In a recent scrutiny conducted by the Income Tax Department of the Govt. of India, our financial details and accountancy were considered as per laws and clear.
  • Not only are our activities and documents regular but they have regularly been submitted to concerned authorities and received official approvals.

Also in this very FIR, the 9 founder members are accused, in a confused manner, of “forgery” because one of the members, Vrinda Dar, transferred part of her property to another member Pietro Cocco as an individual; a transfer that was done legally and registered with the property registration office as per the FEMA rules and regulations and with approval from Income Tax Authorities.”

When the KS management went to meet the Varanasi District Magistrate to object about the FIR, he was apologetic, saying that an FIR is not malicious and that it is just a necessary step taken by the Varanasi police after receiving many complaints from local people (on Facebook!). Perhaps it is true. But one can surely suspect malice because non-bailable charges in the FIR have been made on a very well known organization that has been a partner of the District Authorities for many years and with which, in the past five years, there has been a fierce, but until now honest, litigation in the Allahabad High Court.

And what is particularly inappropriate is the accusation of “Forgery for purpose of cheating” (469 of IPC) and “using as genuine a forged document” (471) concerning the authorisation by Indian authorities to carry out civil society activities in Varanasi, when in fact the authorisations have been given in writing by the Indian authorities themselves.

I thinks that both FIRs are basically forms of harassment and mental torture meant to discourage her from proceeding with the PIL. But she wants to continue and she wants the Varanasi people to be informed about what is happening. She has shared a Film-Camera.png video interview on YouTube icon block.png ⇒ the TVP channel.

On the facebook page of the Kautilya Society, she sent an appeal to all members and friends to share her message, and this article, as widely as possible so that she is not left alone in bearing harassment in return for demanding legality in Varanasi; and for trying to preserve as much as possible of the Varanasi heritage so that future generations can better understand the values of the Indian traditional culture.

The video has been widely shared by the social media, largely divided in support or opposition to the KS advocacy efforts. [45]

 

_________________

References

The reasons why I believe both the FIRs are malicious:

  • the Government Authorities say that they have acted on the basis of complaints they received from the public, but then they filed criminal charges against me before even contacting me or requesting me for clarifications on issues for which they are receiving such complaints. This is not the standard way of dealing with complaints. What was their haste in filing an FIR before asking questions?
  • In both the FIRs, I am accused of infringing norms of the Indian Penal Code that are not bailable (i.e. these sections of the Indian Penal Code that permit the police to arrest me without bail) but these are inconsistent with the allegations made in the FIRs. Even if we were accused of wrongdoings, these would come under the civil law, not under the Penal Code. Penal Code sections have been quoted in the FIRs without linking the alleged actions with the Indian Penal Code norms.
  • I am accused of carrying out illegal civil society related activities, while these have been regularly reported to the concerned Indian Authorities and for which I have received, in writing, required permissions and certifications. In the FIRs, I am accused by Authorities of forging documents that in fact are regular certifications provided by the competent authorities.

 

Heritage: the resource for the future

Our only asset is the past. We have many plans, many desires, many fears for  the future. We live our present life oriented towards the future. Without hopes for a better future there would be no motivation to study, to share, to act, to keep up. But the means we use for living and growing have arrived to us from the past.

From the past we have inherited the culture, the manners, the paths. And we also have been supplied with a good deal of unsolved problems: finding new solutions is our present enterprise. From the past we have inherited the knowledge, the tools, the laws that we need now for solving these problems. Our new solutions will create new problems that the people of the future will have to solve. And what they can use for their future endeavours are the knowledge, the tolls and the laws which we will be able to hand over to them.

We are now enjoying many fruits of development. The way of thinking that has made the development possible has been handed over to us by the previous generations. They have handed over to us technologies more effective than those they had received; medicines much more powerful, and social systems much better organised. We are enjoying all that. But we are also facing a new scarcity of good things that were better enjoyed in older times: previous generations had more time, a cleaner environment, more united families. We have a smaller world. They had more relaxed communities.

So, sometimes, trying to solve the problems we are facing now we look back, trying to recuperate good things lost along the race for economic progress. And so we start re-appreciating the cultural heritages of the past: we search back for knowledge of the spiritual aspects of  the human being, for ways to have more relaxed family life, for educational methods capable of fostering a deeper esthetical taste.

In this search we travel to remote villages, visit old cities, learn old professions, receive initiation to traditional arts.

In this search many of us have arrived toBanaras, a special city, where for centuries people have come in search of the old paths.

InIndiato travel to Benares has always meant to abandon desires, struggles, achievements in order to renovate one’s spirit. It’s a town where the past is living, where the oldest traditions survive. For the world in the past 50 years to travel to Benares has become a sort if spiritual initiation to what has mainly been lost in the rest of the world.

Many people arriving at Benaras are able to see beneath the veil of dirt and confusion to enjoy the magic of the place. It is a unique experience. It gives the possibility of returning to one’s usual environment with a broader vision of the human being and his destiny.

This is the resource the Benaras offers to the future: a living possibility for confronting with the roots of  human history.  As far as ancient traditions are kept alive in places likeBanaras, we will have the possibility of comparing what we have achieved with what we have scarified. This will give us the possibility of  correcting our mistakes. When traditions will die also in Benares, even if the facade of old palaces were preserved and the ancient manuscripts were all properly cataloged in  the libraries, the world will be far poorer. And development will become far more dangerous.

“We cannot spend our money  for future welfare! We need to enjoy the returns for our investments!” This is the justification of those who are ready to sell off the common heritage.  But investing for the future does not make us poorer: it will teach us how to share knowledge, which is the thing that makes us fertile. To care for others produces a richer culture. Through culture, we enlarge the limit of our consciousness, to include within our self-identity also the well being of the others, the well being of nature, the well being of future generations. If we are rooted on a value system that values culture, we will be able to enjoy the pleasure of “spending” for others, because we do not feel the others strangers, but as factors of our own deeper self.

 

May Kashi be a model of responsible tourism !

Prof Enrico Fasana was Professor of Indian History in the University of Trieste, Italy. Gave us this interview for the first (paper) edition of Varanasi Biradari in 2001. Unfortunately he is no longer with us.  But his words continue to be current. We decided to share the article again and re-print it in the blog

Question:  What is your opinion about the new trend of constructing hotels along the Ghats of Varanasi?

Let me start by expressing what I consider to be most important.

I strongly feel, like many other of my colleagues and the citizens of the world, that India has a responsibility towards the world and towards herself to develop in harmony with her spiritual and cultural identity. Varanasi is a universal heritage city and not just for urban Indian or foreign tourists. To betray Varanasi sand permit its cultural, environmental and social decadence or unsustained commercial exploitation of its unique heritage resources would be a betrayal to tradition and to our future generations.

The development of tourism in India surely has vast economic potentials but selling out for short-term gains will lead to only the long term loss of her social and cultural identity. To render such development sustainable, it is indispensable that the traditional approach to tourism be continued; a tourism that is in organic harmony with the existing social and physical structure of towns. Utilising huge financial resources to unbalance the existing harmony is unsustainable.

Religious tourism in Varanasi has given to the city, for centuries, enormous economic benefits while maintaining the development of spiritual, philosophical and artistic knowledge. Temples, royal palaces, and ashrams have been the focal points for such tourism.

Foreign tourism interested in observing such traditions was begun by the  British. It developed outside the cultural and religious centers of towns, usually in the cantonment areas. These too have contributed to increasing the wealth of the area and to the success of large chains of hotels like the Clarks, Taj, etc. However, utilising these models to unsettle existing patterns of hospitality and tourism is dangerous for the tourism industry itself.

Do you think that construction of hotels could be one way of financing the conservation of old palaces and structures along the ghats?

I don’t think that construction of large hotels is the sustainable solution. Large chains of hotels usually bring their own personnel, managers, shops, etc and employ the local labour only as the lower staff. They don’t use the local boatmen, local shops, brahmins, masseurs, etc. and their luxury tourists don’t venture out to see tiny and congested lanes which are the beauty of a town like Varanasi.

This not only has a negative economic impact on the local people but also contributes to killing local jobs and sustained employment patterns. It burdens the local carrying capacity in water and electricity usage, pollutes the already congested areas with CFCs from air conditioners and poisonous fumes and noise from generators.

Ashrams, maths and small guest houses are undoubtedly much more integrated and in harmony with the existing social, religious and cultural dynamics of the town, the ghats and the river.

Hotels should be the last resort of any development plan along the ghats of Varanasi. Towns like Puri, Haridwar, etc. are already facing the invasion of such hotels and their unsustained presence, both culturally and physically. The construction of only those hotels- small or medium sized- must be permitted that leave totally undisturbed the human and physical environment surrounding it. Such economic initiatives must not be dictated by large economic interests but must follow de-centralised patterns. They must emerge from the grass roots, from within the local environment, the mohalla. True democracy always emerges from the roots and is the only kind culturally and socially viable in the long run.

This is what really the Mahatma Gandhi advocated in his philosophy of Khadi and Swadeshi. His was an approach to contribute to the global culture by preserving local identities.

Varanasi holds a sublime place  in Indian consciousness. What is done in this city will be an example for the rest of the nation. Will India decide to respect her soul and find an original solution to the need for development or will she simply acquiesce to global patterns?

 

Landmark High Court Order Exposes Blatant Violation of Civil Laws in Varanasi

A landmark High Court Order has exposed new illegal constructions built by demolishing an old palace located on the Ganga riverfront ghats in Varanasi.

Majestic Darbhanga Palace along the riverfront ghats

Darbhanga Palace being demolis

The Allahabad High Court judge bench of Justice Ashok Bhushan and Justice Arun Tandon studied documents and photographs shared by the Kautilya Society and submitted that new constructions have been made in the Darbhanga Palace in the “guise of restoration of the building”.

They further stated that these constructions were in violation of the U.P. State Government Order dated 11 April 2001, were contrary to Varanasi Development Authority’s (VDA) sanction conditions and did not respect the conditional licence granted by the Archaeological Survey of India. VDA will explain all the “non-compliance” of this case.

The Kautilya Society has been advocating, for more than a decade, for stricter compliance of the government directive that prohibits new constructions within 200 metres of the Ganga riverfront ghats so that the beauty and stability of the unique Ghats is preserved.

Religious building violating civil laws

The negligence of the Varanasi Development Authority (VDA) in implementing this directive has resulted in rampant mushrooming of illegal constructions for making hotels and religious structures that encroach the ghats and risk damaging them forever.

See the  Allahabad High Court Order of 9 October 2013

High Court denies Government the permission to construct on Assi Ghat in Varanasi

Assi Ghat - Varanasi 2001

Kautilya Society’s Public Interest Litigation for protecting the Ganga riverfront Ghats of Varanasi took a positive turn at the hearing yesterday, 29 July 2013, as the Allahabad High Court turned down the request of the Varanasi Municipal Corporation to make permanent structures on and around the Assi Ghat. See the Allahabad High Court Order of 29 July 2013

This appeal was made to the High Court as a follow up part of a recently sanctioned Government of India project to make jetties, toilets, shelters, big bathing platforms, parks, kiosks, parking area, greening, 9 metre wide and 635 metre long promenades, as part of an ambitious riverfront development plan on and around Assi Ghat in Varanasi.

Reminding the Varanasi Municipal Corporation and the state government about the Government Order prohibiting construction along the Ganga, Justice Ashok Bhushan and Justice Arun Tandon questioned the added value and sustainability of large scale construction activity on the ghats on the Ganga riverfront Ghats in Varanasi and categorically denied all permission to build permanent structures on the ghats. The Hon’ble judges also expressed serious concern on government sanctioned plans and schemes that destroy heritage, pollute the River Ganga and completely ignore civil laws and Government Orders.

In its counter affidavit to the government’s appeal for permissions to make permanent structures on the riverfront Ghats, the Kautilya Society questioned the soundness of a development plan that followed a top-down approach and did not take into account the protection of the natural, architectural and cultural resource of this unique city of Varanasi and that promoted new construction without protecting, rehabilitating and strengthening existing structures and Ghats.

In response to an appeal by the Kautilya Society, the Hon’ble judges of the Allahabad High Court have asked the Varanasi Development Authority to speed up resolution on cases of illegal constructions that are pending in lower courts as well as to completely demolish the illegal structures that have only been partially demolished by them.

The next hearing of this Public Interest Litigation on 2 September 2013 is expected to include clarifications by the central and state governments on their ambitious plans on riverfront development.

VDA overdoes its duty to follow Allahabad High Court instructions asking to strengthen surveillance against illegal constructions in Varanasi

Is the Varanasi Development Authority overdoing its duty of following the Allahabad High Court instructions to strengthen its surveillance against illegal constructions in Varanasi?

We sure are glad to know that Varanasi Development Authority (VDA) is finally taking extreme care in preventing illegal constructions on the Ganga riverfront ghat heritage zone in Varanasi.

Maybe they’ve gone a bit too far this time round, by raiding a private building just for the possession of cement bags!

And maybe they have gone against the law once again, by forcing their way in a private building without written official authorisation.  Surely they did not seem to be acting in good faith by publicly condemning supposed “intentions” and by hastening to spread the news that the Kautilya Society supposedly “ran into troubles” for having “wrong intentions”.

Here are the facts for everyone to judge.

On 8th June 2013, a battalion of 5 VDA officers, including Mr. Satish Chandra Mishra, Joint Secretary of the Varanasi Development Authority (VDA), forced their way into the official premises of the Kautilya Society in Varanasi, in the absence of the building owner and without consigning to the caretaker or the staff any written documentation about who they were, what was the objective of their request to visit the building, and what was the authority they had in doing that.

The VDA “assault unit” forced their way in by harassing the hesitant staff, which had orders not to let anyone, who is not a member of the Society, enter in the building, which is residential accommodation for many member students, including girls.  One lady staff says that she was even manhandled. The Kautilya Society staff objected to this forced entry into the office premises, so VDA’s raiding platoon of five men called for the support of the police force to overcome the bold resistance of 1 Managing committee member, one lady cook and one lady manager. The VDA even called the police for lodging an FIR against one of the staff because he was not authorizing the visit without being given a written official instruction about who was permitted to visit and why.

Well! the VDA officers entered the building, they found evidence of what they thought was the “evidence of crime” of the Kautilya Society. Did they find secret documents?  No!  Illegal constructions? No!  They found only some cement bags and some piled Chunar stones!  Oh!  And that seemed to be enough to prove that the Kautilya Society had wrong intentions to build an unauthorized floor!

Happy with their “Great” finding, they went to the press and said out loud “the Kautilya Society runs into trouble and their employees obstruct the course of law!

That the VDA harasses the Kautilya Society is not a novelty, since they are under trial by the Allahabad High Court as part of a PIL lodged by the Kautilya Society against it.  (See below for other details about the progress of the PIL).

What is surprising is that newspapers as serious as the Times of India, which previously reported about the VDA inefficiency on protecting the heritage zone, immediately accepted without verification the VDA information, and went on to publish the news that “Kautilya Society runs into troubles”.

Did the journalists not think it strange that the VDA, that has not been following the orders of Allahabad court to demolish those unauthorized illegal constructions on the Ganga riverfront ghats in Varanasi that the VDA itself listed as “illegal”, suddenly raids the non-government organisation that has lodged the PIL against them and is working for protecting the heritage zone in Varanasi, and discovers “the presence of “cement bags and stones” and so decides that the Kautilya Society had wrong intentions?

Did the journalists not find it strange that an FIR was issued against an employee for not allowing entry into a private building of persons who arrived without written authorisation and papers?

Did the journalist not have any doubts that the raid, by 5 VDA officers, on an official holiday, into the official premises of the Kautilya Society, was disproportionate to the normal efforts that VDA generally makes in order to avoid illegalities in Varanasi?   Well, we think, a newspaper like the Times of India should give a second look at the incident.

Don’t you think so?

http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2013-06-08/varanasi/39833097_1_vda-varanasi-development-authority-building-owner;

http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2012-09-04/varanasi/33581483_1_vda-officials-constructions-ganga

http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2012-10-11/varanasi/34385704_1_vda-kautilya-society-demolition-drive

http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2012-09-04/varanasi/33581483_1_vda-officials-constructions-ganga

The Kautilya Society Secretary says that its staff was only relocating some construction material (iron garters, some stones and cement bags) that it had stored in the premises for internal and emergency repair work.  And that the Kautilya Society is not so naïve as to do unauthorized construction, since they are confronting the VDA and are under their special surveillance, so that VDA can take any small opportunity to hurl accusations against them and try to discredit the organization in the eyes of the Allahabad High Court that has been quite harsh and tough against the VDA. The Kautilya Society did not consider the possibility of an unannounced purposeful inspection intended for finding evidence of “wrong” intentions!

We leave the judgment to the reader’s intelligence.

Here, below is some additional information about the Kautilya Society and the PIL that it lodged in 2005 against the VDA for violating the civil laws, U.P.State Government orders, the National Monuments Act . And the links to the web site that give more information about it.

Two of the latest High Court orders on the PIL 31229 of 2005

http://www.kautilyasociety.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Kautilya-Society_PIL_Allahabad-High-Court-Order_-27July12.pdf;

http://www.kautilyasociety.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/PIL_Allahabad-High-Court-Order_14March20131.pdf

The Allahabad High Court Judgment Information System: http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do?judgmentID=2447321

P.S. The Kautilya Society has written an official complaint to the senior police and administrative officers of Varanasi and the U.P. State government asking that appropriate legal action be taken against this unlawful behaviour of VDA officers who misused their official power and took law into their hands, used unconstitutional language, harassed organisational staff, violated right to privacy by forcing entry into the office premises without official authorisations, defamed and tarnished the image of the Kautilya Society and the General Secretary, gave misleading  information to both the police and the press in order to defame the organisation that has lodged a PIL against them.

On asking the Public Information Officer about the reason for the raid, through the Right to Information Act, Satish Chandra Mishra, the VDA officer leading the inspection team declared that “he organised the raid (on a holiday) because he was solicited by Mr. V.K.Singh, the Vice Chairman of VDA who had “personal hostility” against persons of the Kautilya Society. This is the official recorded written statement!

Finally some response did come from the Varanasi Superintendent of Police. But it was not a response to the report of the Kautilya Society on misuse of power by VDA officers. And what was it? Another FIR!

Kautilya Society Posts: http://www.kautilyasociety.com/blog/banks-of-the-river-ganga-in-varanasi-might-still-survive-the-onslaught-of-illegal-constructions/

See the Story of the PIL at http://www.kautilyasociety.com/blog/varanasi/protecting-the-ganga-ghats-public-interest-litigation-filed-against-varanasi-development-authority/

 

We see here four VDA officers in Ram Bhawan, writing the FIR against the KS staff. In their inspection they did not find any construction irregularity. So in the FIR they said that they have been “assaulted” (by the old lady standing in the photo) and insulted (by Vrinda who was not in India) …. comic or tragic?

In the FIR, it is stated that the KS staff obstructed VDA officers from verifying whether KS was respecting building norms; but the inspecting team freely carried out a thorough investigation at the KS premises and did not find any architectural illegality. Here, we see the VDA officers inspecting the terrace of Ram Bhawan, the KS residency, in a congenial atmosphere – Varanasi 8 June 2013

The 2013 Mahakumbha Mela in Allahabad

Millions of pilgrims bathe at the most holy confluence of Indian rivers 

A Sea of Humanity at the Maha Kumbha 2013

The Kumbha Mela has its origins in Hindu mythology, in one of the most popular medieval texts, the Bhagavata Purana. Kumbha literally means “the urn/pitcher”. The first written evidence of the Kumbha Mela can be found in the accounts of Chinese traveler, Huan Tsang or Xuanzang (602 – 664 A.D.) who visited India in 629 -645 CE.

 

The story goes that the demigods lost their strength due to the curse of a sage, Durväsä Muni. Lord Vishnu instructed the demigods to churn the ocean of milk for the elixir/ nectar of immortality. To do this, the demi-gods had to make an agreement with their arch enemies, the demons or Asuras, to to churn out the nectar together and then share it equally thereafter. However, when the Kumbha containing the nectar appeared from the ocean, a fight ensued. For twelve days and twelve nights (equivalent to twelve human years) the gods and demons fought in the sky for the pot of nectar. It is believed that during the battle, Lord Vishnu flew away with the Kumbha containing the nectar of immortality, spilling drops at Allahabad, Haridwar, Ujjain and Nashik, the four places where the Kumbh festival has been held for centuries. In each of these cities, the “Ardha Kumbha” (or half kumbha) is held every six years and the “Purna Kumbha” is held every 12 years.

 

The Kumbha at Allahabad (Prayag) has a special significance because it is held on the confluence of three rivers, the holy Ganga, Yamuna and the mythical Saraswati, where bathing is considered especially auspicious for purifying oneself from sins.

Celebrated after 12 years, (the last one having been held in 2001), the 2013 pilgrimage gathering is a Maha Kumbh Mela (Festival) that only happens after 12 purna kumbhs, i.e once every 144 years, and always at Allahabad.

"We couldn't miss the fun", says the elephant.

 

The festival is considered to be the biggest religious gathering in the world. During the Maha Kumbha in 2001, more than 40 million people gathered on the main bathing day at Allahabad, breaking a world record for the biggest human gathering.

Kautilya Tents @ Maha Kumbh Mela

Dormitories @ Rs. 1000/night
Private Tents @ Rs. 4500/night 

Kautilya Society Camp

Over the next 45 days, tens of millions of Hindus are expected to take a dip in the Holy River Ganga, worshipped as “Mother Ganga”, in Allahabad where the rivers Ganga and Yamuna and the mythical river Saraswati meet. They are all participating in the Maha Kumbha Mela, takes place once in every twelve years in Allahabad and is regarded by many as “the biggest human gathering in the world.” The Kumbha Mela is thought to have been recorded for the first time by a Chinese traveler in early seventh century AD. Pilgrims believe that bathing in the water during these days will purify their souls of sin and bring good karma.

Tents

Would you like to come and stay in the tents organised by the Kautilya Society? Would you like to join the pilgrims as they bathe in the holy River Ganga in the Maha Kumbha Mela at Allahabad? Send an email to kautilya.at.kumbh@gmail.com.

A Short Intro to the Kumbh

This year’s festival is especially significant as it is a once-in-a-lifetime Maha (Great) Kumbh, held after 12 Purna Kumbhs, so every 144 years, and only in Allahabad. The Purna (full) Kumbh Mela takes place in four locations, Allahabad, Haridwar, Ujjain, and Nashik every 12 years. An Ardh (half) Kumbh is held in Haridwar and Allahabad six years after (and six years before) every Purna Kumbh. The exact timing, duration and location of each festival are calculated according to an astrological chart.

Filocafe' - Cafe', Common Space and Media Center

The Kumbh Mela comes from one of the most revered chapters of the ancient Hindu Purana texts, in which demigods fight with demons for possession of a Kumbha (urn) full of Amrita, a special nectar that would replenish the strength of the demigods. The fight lasted 12 days and 12 nights, the equivalent to 12 human years. The story goes that during the fight, drops of nectar fell from the Kumbha at the four locations where the festival is held.

Tents and Tents as Far as the Eyes can See

Over the course of the festival there are specific days, selected according to astrological factors, that are considered particularly holy. The most prestigious of these is the Mauni Amavasya Snan, the main bathing day which sees the greatest number of participants wading through the rivers. At the last Purna Kumbh Mela in 2001, it is estimated that around 40 million people bathed in the river Ganga on that day alone. This year the main bathing day will take place on February 10.

Organising the festival (with 30,000 police officers being deployed) and moving the state mechanism is thought to have cost the Indian state an equivalent of 150 million Euros. The 55-day event is expected to generate between 1.6 billion and two billion Euros-worth of income, with contributions coming from millions of domestic and foreign tourists.