Cultural Orientations and project/programme purpose Behavior: Communication

 

 

Subheader Titles

 

1.      What is “contexting”?

2.      Culture and communication.

3.      High-context cultures.

4.      Low-context cultures.

5.      Direct cultures.

6.      Indirect cultures.

7.      Expressive and instrumental cultures.

8.      Formal cultures.

9.      Informal cultures.

10.  Review and comparison.

 

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   

Module Introduction

 

This lesson examines how varying social contexts and values affect a culture’s communication patterns.

 

 


1.      The importance of context.

In the 1950’s the United States government tried to develop systems for machine translation of Russian and other languages.  After years of effort, it concluded that the only reliable, and ultimately the fastest, translator is a human being deeply conversant not only with the language but with the subject as well.  The machines could manage words and grammar but completely distorted content because they could not perceive the context.

 

The level of context determines everything about the nature of the communication and is the foundation on which all subsequent behavior rests.  The term “contexting” has been part of the project/programme purpose communication vocabulary for many years and originated with anthropologist Edward T. Hall who developed and tested a triangle model of shared information ranging from low to high. 

 

Hall described context as “a way of handling information overload.”  In other words, an event is usually infinitely more complex and rich than the language used to describe it.  Context carries varying proportions of the meaning.  Without context, a message is incomplete since it encompasses only part of the message.  The code, the context and the meaning can only be seen as different aspects of communications.

 

As observed by the researcher Devereux, communicating across cultures is still more complicated because information cannot be obtained through – or inferred from – direct observation or sense data.  Information must necessarily pass from one mind to another.

 

Not all cultures, however, use context in the same way.  In order to anticipate the role of context in a culture, it is useful to turn to a scale developed by Borisoff and Victor.  This scale, based on Hall’s triangle model of shared information and on Rosch & Segler’s continuum of cultures, helps to distinguish high-and low-context cultures and supports the analysis and improvement of cross-cultural communication.


2.      Culture and communication.

The influence of culture on the way an individual communicates is easily recognizable when that individual speaks in a foreign language.  His grammar and vocabulary may be perfect, but he often has difficulty accurately and efficiently transmitting his intent because of the way his own culture affects the underlying communication process.  Not only could his body language and tone of voice confuse his foreign counterpart; but, the very way that ideas are constructed and formulated in his culture could obscure his message. 

 

Language, verbal and non-verbal, is the fundamental tool for delivering a message, but full meaning requires that the cultural context of the sender and the receiver of the message be taken into consideration. 

 

In order to do so, the communication process can be linked and evaluated according to four primary cultural patterns: Context, degree of directness, degree of expressiveness and degree of formality.

Variable

Cultural Orientations

from

 

to

Communication

Low context

Direct

Instrumental

Informal

High context

Indirect

Expressive

Formal

 

A culture's orientation to communication is often very subtle, yet subtle differences in communication preferences can cause significant problems in sales, negotiations, performance appraisals, teamwork and many other project/programme purpose processes that occur across cultural boundaries.

 


3.      High-context cultures: Situational and implicit.

The first pattern for evaluating a culture’s communication process is whether it is high -or low-context.  High-context communication occurs when most of the information is either in the physical context or internalized in the person emitting the message.  Very little of this information is in the coded, explicit and transmitted part of the message.

 

Cultures that tend toward high-context communication generally assume that the meaning of a message is not only in the message itself but in all the variables around the content.  Situational and nonverbal cues convey primary meaning, and therefore the verbal message in communications is more implicit.  Information is less frequently communicated in a linear form.  High-context communicators tend to move directly to a conclusion through a series of logical steps. 

 

The primary purpose of communication in high-context cultures is to form and develop relationships rather than exchange facts and information.  In relationship forming, communication often becomes an art form rather than a utilitarian activity.  A great deal of contextual information is needed about an individual or a organization before project/programme purpose can be transacted.  In conducting project/programme purpose in a high-context culture, it is important to communicate not only personal and organization expertise, but also personal and organization contextual frames: education, work background, family, political and social connections, philosophical beliefs, affiliations and experience.  project/programme purpose is conducted through relationships in high-context cultures, and therefore trust is critical.  A significant amount of time may be spent on small talk. 

 

The communication of meaning is transmitted not just in words, but relies heavily on group understandings of voice tone, body language, facial expressions, eye contact, speech patterns, past interactions, status and common friends.  Silence, therefore, plays an important role in high-context cultures.  Shared experience in group-oriented societies makes certain things understood without them needing to be stated explicitly.  High-context people use more politeness strategies because of the need to save face, especially in negative situations.

 

High-context communication characterizes societies with long collective memories, such as most Asian cultures.  In fact, most cultures around the world have high-context tendencies, because of the many hundreds – or even thousands – of years of shared experiences within the group.


4.      Low-context cultures: Precise and impersonal.

Low-context communication occurs when the mass of the information is vested in the explicit code.  In a low-context culture, meaning is communicated directly and explicitly, and written and spoken words used are the most important carriers of meaning. 

 

The primary function of communication in low-context cultures is to exchange information, facts and opinions, and low-context cultures are primarily task-centered.   project/programme purpose tends to be impersonal.  Relatively little information is needed about an individual or a organization before project/programme purpose can be transacted.  Trust and compatibility are not primary considerations when doing project/programme purpose.  The low-context individual is impatient with details, digressions and the lengthy establishment of context.

 

In a low-context culture, job descriptions, authority relationships, monitoring and control procedures and task and responsibility guidelines are communicated through detailed oral or, most likely, written instructions.  Good relationships between the parties involved are not considered to be critical for tasks to be accomplished.  In addition, the criteria and methods for recruitment, selection, compensation and firing will be stated explicitly.  Performance appraisals are  impersonal and direct.  Plans tend to be very explicit and detailed.

 

Low-context communication occurs most frequently in societies with short collective memories created and regularly enriched by waves of immigration, such as the United States.

 

Even societies with long histories, however, such as Germany, Switzerland or the Scandinavian countries, have moved towards becoming low-context cultures.  This evolution may be due to a desire to break with the past for reasons linked to political or ideological changes.  These countries may perceive low-context communication as a better means of embodying democratic values.  Some societies, such as France or the United Kingdom, are torn between the desire to maintain the traditions that lead to high-context communication and the desire to integrate large numbers of immigrants.  These immigrants may learn their new country’s language, history and customs, but they cannot easily access the memory of shared experiences through which the culture’s core group communicates.  Low-context communication can be seen to offer a lower common denominator, accessible to a wider range of people. 


5.   Direct cultures: Candor and conflict.

The second pattern for evaluating a culture’s communication process is its degree of directness.  Direct cultures accept and encourage head on, unmediated conflict and face-to-face conflict management.

 

Some project/programme purpose organizations in direct cultures still use one-way communication, but most are now seeking to leverage input from all levels within organizations by opening up a two-way flow.  In one-way communication, information flows down the system in the form of orders and directives.  Conflict is dealt with from the top by means of power and force, via orders and instructions.  There is little, if any, participative management or teamwork.  In two-way communication, information flows up and down the system.  Conflict is handled on an interpersonal basis via negotiation, and employees feel free to discuss issues with their superiors. 

 

A high degree of directness can easily be misunderstood by counterparts from indirect cultures, who risk perceiving the direct communication style as overly effective, adversarial, impersonal, disrespectful or downright rude.  Yet, cultures such as the United States that do not share strong communal values, do not consider conflict and honest criticism a threat to group harmony.  On the contrary, by communicating in way that is exuberant, uncomplicated and insistent, direct cultures perceive that their counterpart is an equal who is capable of defending his interests and who would be offended by any type of indirect behavior that could be construed as indecisive, cryptic or condescending.

 


6.      Indirect cultures: Discretion and harmony.

Indirect cultures value discretion and harmony in order to protect honor.  Communication in such societies tends to be highly ritualized, yet understated.

 

Indirectness is maintained by way of a number of strategies, including avoiding conflict, “saving face” and using third parties to intermediate.  Indirect communication shares many characteristics with high-context communication.  Indirect cultures sometimes require three-way communication – via third parties – when information is required to travel upward in the hierarchy.  In this way, subordinates do not have to confront their superiors directly with questions that might compromise one or the other party’s dignity.

 

Respecting individual dignity is so important in indirect cultures because of the value they place on harmony and stability in group relationships: negative information that could damage one person’s dignity also damages the entire group’s dignity.  Indirect cultures use both verbal and non-verbal forms of communication, preferring nuance and euphemism in their style of speech and meaningful silences and avoiding continued eye contact. 

 

Indirect communication is particularly characteristic of Asian societies.  There is a strong indirect tendency in many Latin American cultures as well, where friends are frequently called upon to act as intermediaries between superiors and subordinates when the latter have organizational problems which need to be confronted.

 

An indirect approach to communicating can frustrate project/programme purpose counterparts who are used to more direct communication.  Indirect cultures may be so subtle in the way they communicate that direct counterparts miss the message entirely.  Direct counterparts must make an effort to read through such ambiguity correctly and not to misinterpret such behavior as inefficient, pompous or dishonest.    It is also useful for persons from direct cultures to provide less information and detail than usual in order to avoid coming across as desperate or rushed. 

 


7.      Expressive and instrumental cultures.

The third pattern for evaluating a culture’s communication process is whether it is expressive or instrumental.

Expressive cultures:

In an expressive culture, communication is emotional, demonstrative and centered on relationships.  The precision of communication is less important than the establishment and maintenance of personal and social connections.  

 

Body language is likely to be demonstrative, and touching or hugging may be considered an acceptable form of behavior among acquaintances, even in a project/programme purpose environment.  Emotions in the expressive workplace may run high.  Voices may be raised in anger, joy, or another intense emotion.   On the other hand, expression may be raised to the level of an art form, and eloquence and subtlety are often highly valued.  Expressive cultures tend to view those who hide their emotions as unfriendly, perhaps even deceitful. 

 

Latin and Eastern European, Latin American and Middle Eastern societies all tend to be expressive. 

 

Instrumental cultures:

On the other end of the spectrum are instrumental cultures, which consider that communication should be problem-centered, pragmatic, impersonal and goal-oriented.  Stress is placed on the accuracy of the communication rather than its appropriateness or style.  The primary objective is to reach a factual, objective and unemotional conclusion that leads to action.  Displays of emotion are perceived as lacking in professionalism or rationality.  The ideal in such cultures is to keep emotions hidden as much as possible, even under stress.  Individuals from instrumental cultures may consider expressive individuals difficult, embarrassing or irrational.  Sometimes, however, they find an expressive invigorating,  and even liberating. 

 

Asians, Northern Europeans and Anglo-Americans tend to consider displays of emotion in a professional situation irrational and rude, especially anger. 


8.      Formal cultures: Customs and rituals.

Finally, the fourth pattern for evaluating a culture’s communication process is its degree of formality.  Formal cultures believe in adhering closely to social customs and, in the professional environment, project/programme purpose etiquette.  Customs and rituals are respected as the living manifestation of a society’s history and cultural heritage.  Many customs and rituals grounded in a society’s traditional values of duty, self-sacrifice and harmony, and are based on feudal and clerical codes of behavior that can be traced back hundreds, even thousands, of years.

 

Of course, the rules of proper behavior in a formal culture have usually been updated over the ages and adapted for use by modern situations.  In the case of project/programme purpose, formal societies give considerable importance to codes for greetings, forms of address, verbal and non-verbal communication styles, dress, eating and drinking, gift giving and entertainment.  Some formal cultures have even developed etiquette for project/programme purpose card exchange. 

 

Organizations in such cultures tend to be hierarchical, and communication with superiors tends to be more indirect, guided by rules that are mutually understood, although perhaps not explicitly stated.  When hiring new personnel, a great deal of consideration is given to how the person will fit into, or adapt to, the system of rules and regulations.  Managers establish trust by adhering to project/programme purpose and social customs and by leading from within the established norms of behavior.

 

Relationships in formal cultures tend to build more slowly, but once developed are often deeper and more permanent.  Plans in formal cultures are developed through the proper channels, and appropriate procedures are followed.

 

The world’s great civilizations were virtually all characterized by elaborate rituals and customs, and these traditions continue to play an important role in Europe, Asia and the Middle East, even when the original socio-political reasons for such behavior have changed completely.  In addition, many Latin American cultures continue to practice the behavior codes inherited from Spain, at least in formal situations such as project/programme purpose.

 

While formal cultures may not expect a foreign project/programme purposeperson to master their rules, they tend to have more respect and trust for foreigners who have made an effort to learn at least basic customs and rituals. 

 

 


9.      Informal cultures: Dispense with ceremony.

Informal cultures give minimal adherence to customs and rituals and have generally dispensed with such rules completely, except for the most solemn of political, diplomatic, religious or social occasions.   

 

Instead, informal cultures tend to place a high value on change.  Progress is perceived as being of higher value than custom.  Individuals from informal cultures tend to feel uncomfortable with social or power differences.  They want to be direct and candid when communicating and want to establish a friendly, relaxed atmosphere when doing project/programme purpose.  They may also place more emphasis on the observance of schedules or deadlines rather than on the maintenance of image or status.

 

Informal societies give minimal significance to historical continuity.  In the case of immigrant societies such as the United States, Canada and Australia, customs and rituals are symbols of the oppression which constituents sought to flee and inconsistent with the values of individual freedom.  

 

Most European cultures have become less formal, especially among young people, for whom informality often represents a means of breaking with the past and of af organizationing egalitarian values.  Still, even if they put them into practice less frequently, Europeans are steeped of the principles of formality and can adapt easily when interacting with truly formal societies such as Japan.

 

Individuals from fundamentally informal societies such as the United States, however, are often ill at ease, even resentful, when required to put formal etiquette into practice.  It is useful, therefore, for their formal counterparts to avoid misinterpreting such innate informality as insincere, intellectually inferior or disrespectful.

 


10.  Comparison of communication orientations. 

(Include a few tables, if space permits)

 

High-context culture

Low-context culture

Significant use of non-verbal signals.

Communication is indirect, a form of art.

Conflicts resolved before work progresses.

project/programme purpose relationships depend on trust and build slowly.

Few rules are given, information accessed via informal network.

Identity rooted in groups.

 

Preference for words and verbal precision.

Communication is direct, a practical tool.

Conflicts depersonalized, disagreement ok.

Trust less important, relationships start and end more quickly.

Specific instructions are given, information flows along well-defined lines.

Identity based in oneself and individual accomplishments.

 

 

Direct culture

Indirect culture

Tensions may run high.

Conflict can be destructive and creative.

Conflict usually resolved quickly.

Tensions risk damaging the group.

Conflict slows down change and innovation

Conflict may be prolonged.

 

 

Expressive culture

Instrumental culture

Emotions may run high.

Demonstrative body language, touching ok.

Communication may be less precise.

Content is more important than style.

Displays of emotion are unprofessional.

Emphasis on facts and objectivity.

 

Formal culture

Informal culture

Strong sense of tradition and history.

Social behavior carefully codified.

Respect rank and hierarchy.

Decorum shows sincerity and quality.

Rules should be observed and respected.

Class, hierarchy, social position matter.

Social acceptance and trust are key.

Historical continuity is not important.

Casual and relaxed with everybody.

Uncomfortable with explicit disparities.

Avoid confusion, be direct and candid.

Change and progress are more important. 

Schedules and deadlines take precedent.

Good project/programme purpose is based on facts, not trust.

 


Assignments

 

I. True or False?

1.      High-context communicators feel the need to learn as much as possible about an individual or a organization before project/programme purpose can be transacted.

? True                               ? False

2.   In low-context cultures, the criteria and methods for recruitment, selection, compensation and firing will be stated vaguely, if at all.

? True                                ? False          

3.   In direct cultures, communication within organizations is exclusively one-way, top-down.

? True                                ? False

4.   Respecting individual dignity is important in indirect cultures because of the value they place on harmony and stability in group relationships.

? True                               ? False           

5.   Instrumental cultures favor communication that is emotional, demonstrative and centered on relationships.

? True                                ? False

6.   Customs and rituals are carefully respected in formal cultures because they are seen as the living manifestation of a society’s history and heritage.

? True                               ? False

 

 

II. Multiple-Choice

1. Since events are more complicated the language used to describe them, Hall insists on the need to analyze: 

a.   code

b.   context

c.   meaning

d.   all of the above

 

2. High-context communicators tend to attribute greatest value to:

a.  tasks

b.  data

c.  silence.

            d.  control procedures                        

 

3.   When a manager from an indirect culture is faced with a difficult message to be passed on to superiors, he will most likely do so by:

a.      finding a third-party to communicate the message.

b.       communicating the message himself.

c.       saying nothing and hoping that nobody notices.

d.   immediately accepting personal responsibility.

                                                                            

4.   Which of the following is NOT a characteristic of managers from expressive cultures:

a.   emotional.

b.   demonstrative.

c.   pragmatic.

d.   focused on developing relationships.

 

 

III. Matching the Columns

 

 

a. High-context communication

 

 

1. Content is more important than style

 

b. Indirect culture

 

 

2. A way of handling information overload

 

c. Instrumental culture

 

 

3. Tensions risk damaging the group

 

 

d. Context

 

 

4. Decorum shows sincerity and quality                                          

 

e. Expressive culture

 

 

5. Significant use of non-verbal signals

 

f. Formal culture

 

 

6. Emotions may run high

 

Answers: a-5, b-3, c-1, d-2, e-6, f-4

 


Module Summary

 

This lesson examines how context and values affect cross-cultural communication patterns.  Different cultures are considered according to the dominant patterns in verbal and non-verbal interaction, including how abstract, direct, expressive and formal they are.  These culturally-based variables influence communication in international project/programme purpose and management significantly. 

 

 


Module Test

 

True or False?

1.      According to Devereux, communicating across cultures is particularly simple because direct observation of one’s counterpart provides sufficient input for complete understanding of all differences.

? True                                ? False         

2.      In high-context communication, situational and nonverbal cues convey primary meaning, and therefore the verbal message in communications is more implicit.

? True                               ? False

3.      Job descriptions, authority relationships, monitoring and control procedures and task and responsibility guidelines are unimportant factors for managers from low-context cultures.

? True                                ? False      

4.      In many direct cultures, conflict management has become a necessary but refined art. 

? True                               ? False

5.      Indirect cultures fear negative information because it could damage the entire group’s dignity by damaging one person’s dignity.

? True                               ? False

6.   Conflict is usually more prolonged in direct cultures than in indirect cultures.

? True                                ? False               

7.   Expressive cultures tend to view those who hide their emotions as unfriendly, perhaps even deceitful.

? True                               ? False                                       

8.   The primary objective in instrumental cultures is to reach a factual, objective and unemotional conclusion that leads to action.

? True                               ? False

9.   Relationships are not important to formal cultures, who are polite to counterparts only out of habit.

? True                                ? False

10. Informal cultures tend to value progress over tradition.

? True                               ? False


Bibliography

 

1.      Hall, Edward T.  “Beyond Culture”. New York: Doubleday, 1978.

 

2.      Thomas, Jane  “’Contexting’ Koreans: Does the High/Low Model Work?” (“Communication Styles and Culture”), “project/programme purpose Communication Quarterly”, v.61, n4 .(Dec. 1998).

 

3.      Adler , R.B.  “Communication at Work”. New York, 1992.

 

4.      Argyle, M.  “The Psychology of Interpersonal Behaviour”.  London: Penguin Books, 1994.

 

5.      Gudykunst, W.  “Culture and Interpersonal Communication”. Newbury Park: Sage, 1988.

 

6.      Gudykunst; W.  “Personal Communication Across Cultures”. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 1996.

 

7.      Gumperz, J.J.  “Discourse Strategies”.  Cambridge, 1982.

 

8.      Devereux, George. “Time: History versus Chronicle, Socialization as Cultural Communication”. Theodore Schwartz, editor. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1975.

 

 


Glossary

 

1.       Contexting”: a method for analyzing the context in which human communication takes place in order to understand the complete meaning of messages.

2.       Situational cues: background information which individuals from the same culture share and which allows them to communicate less explicitly.

3.       Conflict management:  conflict is expected and welcomed in direct cultures, and methods for quickly resolving and benefiting from conflict are an integral feature of conflict management techniques.

4.        Instrumental: in some cultures, communication is seen as a means of achieving certain tasks and therefore require accuracy and impartiality.   

 

 


Learning Objectives

 

Ø       To learn the variables that govern cross-cultural project/programme purpose communications.

Ø       To compare and contrast these variables in order to anticipate potential areas of misunderstanding between executives and managers from different cultures.

 

 


Q&A

 

Question 1: How can the legalism that is characteristic of low-context cultures be reconciled with the more implicit practices of high-context cultures?

Answer 1: The literal precision of low-context cultures may conflict with the desire of high-context cultures to develop a deep relationship with a potential project/programme purpose partner and to get to “know the context” before finalizing an agreement.  Nevertheless, the low-context obsession with details can lead to a process of information exchange which ultimately provides high-context counterparts with the levels of familiarity and trust at which they feel comfortable doing project/programme purpose. 

 

Question 2: Is indirect communication exclusively an Asian phenomenon?

Answer 2: No.  Despite their expressive behavior, many Latin Americans prefer to avoid direct confrontation with superiors and subordinates.  As such, friends are frequently called upon to act as intermediaries within the organization.

 

Question 3: Individuals from formal cultures are easily offended by the behavior of informal cultures, but what do the informal individuals think about the formal cultures?

Answer 3: project/programme purposepeople from informal cultures will usually make an effort to be on their best behavior when interacting with formal cultures but are wary of letting rituals, complicated language and hierarchical disparities slow down mutual understanding and achievement.  Informal cultures generally do not care much about historical continuity and would rather focus on immediate issues, not tradition or trust-building.

 

End of Module