Programme Governance

Designing and Managing Programmes  

Definitions

 

Governance is the act, process, or power of governing (an organization, a company, a community, a state, etc..)

Governance is defined by three fundamental characteristics:

See Professional figures 

The elements that characterize the governance are its culture and its norms. (See  Organizational Culture Professional reputation and standards)

Programs need to define a clear framework and supervision for the organizational activities (projects) because project activities have an impact on the social context where they are implemented as well as on the organisation image and on its work culture.

Project managers co-ordinate individual projects are overseen by the Program Manager, who accounts to the donors community and to the Board of Directors of the organisation.

 

Internal communication within the programme teams is to meet their four major communication needs:

  1. Responsibility of each team member for different parts of the project

  2. Coordination information that enables team members to work together efficiently

  3. Status information tracking the progress, identifying problems and enabling team members to take corrective action

  4. Authorization information - decisions made by beneficiaries, sponsors, and upper management - that relates to the project and its project/programme purpose environment, and enables the team members to keep all project decisions synchronized.

Internal communications happen primarily through team meetings, memos, voice mail, and e-mail. Project managers need to be able to write, speak, and listen well, lead meetings and resolve conflicts effectively.  See also Project communication management)

 

A good program will also identify and attribute specific responsibility in the programme management team in generating project and animate the process of producing the programme results chain (from project deliverable to outcomes, up to programmes impacts) so that the steps of the process are specifically attributed to the managerial structure, where specific professional positions are considered primarily accountable for expected results;
considering internal audit and budget tracking as programme implementation actions, so reporting about them clearly and evaluate their efficiency and transparency.

 

See --- Subsidiarity

 

As stakeholders increasingly demand accountability and transparency, it is becoming imperative that Impact Reports reveal:

M&E, when absorbed down at all levels of the organizational structure, are also strategic in making each team member more accountable for their specific tasks and making the teams accountable for their capacity to generate the communication climate that empowers each member to fulfil her/his role.

 

A fundamental of project management is that :

 (See clarifying the relationship: Responsibilities of Project Managers and programme Managers)

See also:

 

 

 

 

Guidelines:

 

 

See also the  9 topic areas  of project management knowledge, i.e.: Integration, Scope, Time , Cost, QualityHuman Resources, Communication , Risk, Procurement